6PR - Fairfax Radio Network

What we're talking about

  • Chris on Have your say on euthanasia It is my belief that every human being who is of sound mind has the right to decide to take their life to maintain their ... more
  • Dellas on WA director hits it big I can't think of any worse place to be sad and die than Perth between 2008 and now. more
  • Owen Cook on Leaf our ficus alone It's a sure sign of injustice if Gary Adstead focuses on this issue . The trees have been there long before this newly ... more
  • gay on Sue's Tour Highlights Hi Sue love your programme, should be longer. Any chance of identifying the location of the photos? more
  • Deanne on Sue's Tour Highlights Hi sue love listening to u. the photos are beautiful! My favourite is the water lillies .i would just like to tell u that i ... more
  • Bill Thorne on Perth needs to grow up Re Perth needs to grow up.To see how well Canada is doing with traffic congestion, just check out Toronto which is having ... more
  • Evee on Have your say on euthanasia I think suicide is not euthanasia and euthanasia is not suicide. Each is done in circumstances that are vastly different. ... more
  • Alec Strachan on Have your say on euthanasia Its about time voluntary euthanasia was allowed in Australia in circumstances where there is definitely no hope for the ... more
  • eva fisher on Nitschke will fight suspension I think Dr Nitschke has gone too far with his euthanasia kit, he needs therapy, he has lost the plot and is obsessed with ... more
  • Jane on S.O.F. Save Our Ficus I oppose the removal of the ficus trees as they are a habitat to wildlife, provide a natural canopy and were planted to ... more
  • Julie on S.O.F. Save Our Ficus SAVE THOSE TREES.Trees create oxygen people.They cool the envirmoment.They are homes to many wildlife species.These specific ... more
  • John & Betty Blaasch on Has Nitschke Crossed the Line? We heartily agree with Dr Nitschke comments. I have nursed patients with terminal illness and have decided that I would ... more
  • David A on Synergy board members walk This is obviously poorly handled by Nahan's office, he should be sacking some people starting with his chief of staff or ... more
  • Alan on 'a hell beyond hell' A statement of bravery and courage and summed up with the comment "pain is not a story".Our families thoughts are with you. more
  • Laurie on I wish he would just pay up The Premier should get off his backside and make inquiries as to why there was a gag placed on the young lady going to the ... more
  • Laurie on Synergy board members walk Despite what NAHAN has said, the loss of 4 members of the Board does show a certain lack of confidence in his leadership. ... more
  • Tracey on "Are you well hung?" Jackie Lambie - I thought it was funny and I'm over 50 and female!! more
  • Diana on Synergy board members walk Synergy Board members are very savvy people; their resignations are a HUGE vote of No Confidence in Mike Nahan. Replace him ... more
  • Hereinmyhead on Too Many Silly Rules? Wow, a voice of reason! Tracey Brown speaks the truth. There is too much knee-jerk passing of laws and regulations in this ... more
  • Hereinmyhead on "I found bags belonging to Australians" Great comment Dellas, it's all too much! more

The EX - Files

Posted by: Larry Graham | 29 March, 2011 - 10:24 AM
The EX Files

 

 

Larry Graham:

Gas hub failure ends Kimberley jobs hope

 

The pop stars, eco activists and millionaires have finished what they came for and are all long gone - one assumes they are off fighting to save the world somewhere else.

It is unfortunate that these environmental dropkicks never hang around long enough to be confronted with the results of their actions, because in this case they have departed with the long-term economic prospects of the people of the Kimberley.



Read more: WA Today

 


Join the conversation and share the story below 

Follow @NewsTalk6PR

Stay up to date on breaking news with 6PR on Twitter  

     

Share

 

Gee knock me down and call me a sparkie!  King Col’s old boss has given him a get out of jail free card.

 

What are you ranting about? I hear you cry!

 

The great electricity rip-off is what!  The economic regulator headed up by a past champion of deregulation has put out a report that suggests householders’ electricity tariffs could go up by 23.1%.

 

Our regulating deregulator gives two major reasons for recommending ripping us off again.  The Carbon Tax and a rather curious one that goes: Because the government did not put up prices a few years ago - they have to do it now!

 

What?  Run that past me again…………..

 

Yup! Our Government, the same body that didn’t put up the charges for a few years is now being told to retrospectively increase our charges!

 

I wonder what the response of a normal person would be if Coles or Woollies said we put the prices down down too far last time you were here and now you have to pay us extra? 

 

That loaf of bread you bought last week was too cheap and we want more money for it now?   

 

What if the people you bought your last car from came back and said that because it was a sale when you bought your car they now want more money?

 

“Yeah right!” would be the politest answer they would get.  Quite correctly you would not pay and your Government would come down on anyone who tried to act in that way like a ton of bricks.  A contract is a contract they would say!

 

There are many other issues I could rant about with this, including dividend payments to the government, extra charges placed on us by government agencies and the very very very important fact that has been overlooked by our regulating deregulator that the market conditions are in over supply and if they and the government got out of the way prices should fall!

 

BUT, I suspect that the real purpose of this disgraceful report is to give our bumbling government a get out of jail free card in an election year.  The game being played is that Old King Col will rule out these huge increases, only give us little ones, and look like the good guy. 

 

The only real political choice we have is to vote for the Labor party who helped to cause the problem.  Of course we could all vote Green and live in dim solar powered caves, but even I can see the odd problem with that!  So it is back to voting for our saviour - old King Col!

 

I recall the old commo Mikhael Gorbachev once saying that an election without choices is not a democracy!  Time for an outbreak of democracy I say!

Past Blogs

 

By crikey I thought I had heard it all at my age.  It seems that I must have nodded off and woken up in some strange time warped land.  For most of my life I have had to listen to big business telling us that welfare is bad and governments need to take more notice of markets.

 

Now the mighty BHP’s Special K Marius Kloppers joins FMG in the corporate welfare queue and is calling for corporate welfare because international markets are getting tight.

 

This is the same Special K who conned our “great negotiator” over her mining tax – remember that, the tax that collected nothing, but was going to pay for everything. 

 

Good work K!

 

Fellas, your complaints about royalties are nonsense. 

 

Royalties are what you pay the owners of minerals for the rights to those minerals – you know that.  Your complaint is about as smart as a car manufacturer complaining they have to pay for parts to put in the car. 

 

Royalties are the cost of doing business in the business you is in. 

 

For years I have had to sit in meetings and listen to industry lectures about how good, efficient and proactive the mining industry is.  I agree!  It is a fantastic industry AND it is good, efficient and proactive AND it does operate in a world market.

 

BUT it doesn’t need handouts or assistance from the people it buys its produce from.

 

Get over it, get on with it, you had a ball when it was all boom - now do what you do best – mine and don’t whine!

 

  Click here for Larry Graham's opinion piece  in at WAToday.

 

 

Elections can be described as "A method by which the worst possible leader is chosen by the worst possible methods and that worst possible method has started very, very early for us; perhaps it is time for the media to begin reporting anything said by any pollie as a campaign announcement.

 

Planned in precise detail with "spontaneous" announcements that are prepared months, even years in advance, elections bring out the best and worst in our pollies.  Once they get a sniff of an election they just cannot help themselves and you should trust me on this, I know the feeling.  For me elections were like grand finals and I loved them; however that was when they were six weeks long, not six months.

 

We have been in that murky pre-election mode for some time with Unions running anti-Barnett government advertisements; the ALP presenting YouTube and mini issue based campaigns and for their part the Libs have Government plus big campaign signs in their tight seats.  Being in Government gives the Libs the added bonus of being able to clear the decks of problem issues and break good news stories. Any doubts that it is game on were removed last Friday when the National Party launched its campaign for the March 2013 election in Toodyay. 

 

Once this nonsense starts, the language changes and words seem to take on different meanings. Do you ever feel like you need an interpreter to understand the nonsense?  Drawing on friends and colleagues with years of experience here is a political dictionary to try and help

 

Yes = Maybe

Absolutely committed to = Maybe

Rock solid budget commitment = Maybe

Core Promise = Maybe

We will work towards = Maybe

Maybe = NO

Approved subject to Federal funding = NO

Subject to the appropriate processes = NO

We want to work these issues through = NO

Examine the possibility of = NO

Good for WA = Good for the party

Fully funded policy = A guess

We are leading the nation/world = A Lie

Non core promise = A Lie

Budget surplus = Over taxation

Reduced Revenue – We guessed wrong last budget

Forward Estimates = Wish list

I am advised that = What the !@#$$@!@ happened?

Fight for = Stunt

Booming = Broke

Cut through red tape = Form a committee

Exciting new = Tired old

Partnership = Cost shifting

Sustainable outcome = Winning the election

 

There is not a definition for NO, because it will not be heard during the campaign and the same goes for DECISION.  There will be none of those.  Cut the guide out, keep it handy and when you hear a pollie or watch an advert; whip it out to find out what they really mean.

 

It may help to sort the verbal sheep from the goats - or as they say in the Department of Agriculture; sort the quadrapaedic ruminants from the cloven hoofed and horned mammals. 

 

Blog comments Your Say

  • I think you should talk about the bills that have been passed since Julia Gillard has been PM.
    How many bills have been put up by both the opposition and the government and how many have been rejected.
    I note that the wheat bill was passed by the senate last night.
    I would like to know which WA senators voted against the bill.

    Tracy Austin Friday 30 November, 2012 - 8:09 AM
  • Btw, I have never been concerned if a croc is left or right biased. Just before he takes your head off the look in the eyes is the same.

    If you could barrack for a political party like you do a football team, the whole thing would be far easier.

    Unfortunately, when you ask average punters why they support either major party they can't give a quick answer. But they like or hate the respective leaders.

    A worry really where ideology has been superseded by the personality.

    The leaders both stand for nothing, except what the Newspoll says they should.

    We are basically stuffed aren't we?

    Glenn Wednesday 21 September, 2011 - 7:25 PM
  •  

    System the swiss and others use for mini referendums ....same concept as your recall referendum you discussed with Bob. 5% or whatever percentage of electorate has a right for recall if parliament is partitioned. Stops the quislings from changing their positions once elected.

    I think a small party with this as a major platform would have a stunning impact federally if well organized..or maybe trialled in a state first?

    Glenn Wednesday 21 September, 2011 - 7:15 PM
  • YOU REALLY TELL IT AS IT IS .I TOTALLY AGREE WITH EVERY THING YOU SAID. I KNOW YOU WILL NOT GO BACK IN TO PARLIMENT BUT WA NEEDS A MAN LIKE YOU TO LEAD US WITH A NO BULLSHIT ADDITUDE .THANKS MATE HAVE A GOOD BREAK

    PAUL Friday 2 September, 2011 - 10:10 PM

Post a comment * Mandatory fields